Well here it is, having festered in my mind over a great weekend, grown from a tiny insignificant grain of subconscious thought to something so menacing not even this computer screen is likely to display this without a whimper of fear, approaching the Couch Casbah with the momentum of a runaway steam train......MY FIRST RANT. Hi mum, it's me! I'm on the internet!
And just what is this rant, I hear you incredulously ask from the relative comfort and safety behind your computer monitor, which probably is not sparking and arcing as the superconductors struggle to contain these words on the screen like that of yours truly. It is in actual fact about a subject rather close to my heart.....and that is music. Well no, it's not about the music....it is really about the things that play the music and the people that listen to said music through the things playing it.
The core of the matter is really the ipod phenomenom, the boxy white thing mass produced by Apple and sold to "music lovers" by the truckload. Now don't get my wrong, I think the ipod is an absolutely fantastic piece of technology, made by Apple, the computer company that could, underdog to the ominiscient, faceless, soulless Microsoft and as an Australian, it is my duty to support the minnow against the pike. I'm thinking of getting one in actual fact. My problem is not with the ipod itself, but the nefarious users of the wonderful devices. The ipod is a fashion item, not just with its 1960's 2001: A Space Odyssey inspired all white decor but also because it holds personalised playlists of music. Of course, since fashion is a non linear abstract concept, it exists in all its infinite form. If something is personalised, by definition it resonates with a fashion of some kind and becomes fashionable of some kind. If it is fashionable of some kind, the weaker willed sheep of any community dependent on fashions as the backbone to build their pathetic little lives around will take it up like capitalists to a free market economy. And because markets are free and capitalists exist in their multitudes the producers of that fashion are financially rewarded for producing a fashionable good society craves, and hence are encouraged to produce more. It's a vicious circle characteristic of the free market and people's stupidity.
There have been a few times in our little planets history when it was overall fashionable to not be fashionable; underground trends thumbing their noses at ruling heavyweights. A classic bygone example of this occurred around 100 million years ago. Dinosaurs ruled the Earth, seemingly indefatigable and all betting by impartial alien observers would have been on them to have been ruling the Earth in 100 million years time in some form. The majority of land animals at that stage in Earth's history were dinosaurs and more were continually evolving. Insignificant, puny rodents eked out a living below the earth out of harm's way. Like the 80's, power was everything in this tyrannical world. 65 million years ago, God, fate, karma, or a sadistic heavenly body of some kind with an attitude problem decided to play marbles with our little planet, and bang; these tiny little rats inherit the Earth and eventually evolve into us. The little guys triumph! Flash forward to now: the same situation is here. This unholy battle for underground supremecy is fought between today's powerless rodents; the music junkies and the heavyweight dinosaurs; corporations. And the little ipod is in the crossfire and loving it. But how did those little rodents survive underground? They banded together. In today's individualistic world what hope have these two-bit players got? Individualism, expressed through ipod playlists is so rampart that if someone recognises a song on your ipod: you're mainstream. Check out this man, I'm listening to The Clap and The Smoking Tractors and The Insert Vague Possibly Metaphorical Common Noun Here. The Clap? I thought you spread that around along with the free loving.
All this can be personified by an individual who shall remain nameless. Let's call her C Hadrill. No that's too obvious.....she's Caitlin H. A self proclaimed music snob, her precious bands, once subject to her unadultered admiration have been mortally tainted by radio airplay. She's devastated, like any self proclaimed music snob would be. But why is she? Is she jealous, because people will recognise the band listed on her ipod? That's one less band on that thing that's uniquely hers. But its one more band that the common people know about, and in the majority of cases one more band playing music for music's sake on commercial radio stations. Does she fear that commercial airplay will pull them to the brink of commercialism and product endorsements? If they're proper musicians, why would they abandon their roots? Unreasonable selfishness by defining yourself through others' music is the only logical answer. The music itself stays the same. If your appreciation of the music diminishes because others are appreciating it too then surely you're not a true music lover, just a wannabe muso trying to broadcast your supposedly unique character through your socially underplayed music lurking in the depths of your ipod. Caitlin Hadrill is a wonderful friend, but like so many of the typical ipoddians, she does not play a musical instrument herself. If you can own music, then surely that music can only be your own. Wow, unintentional pun through the confusing double meanings of English. I love this crazy language! Whether it's your own by composing it, or perhaps to a lesser extent by playing it, you are either recording or creating the music itself, not the social rights to listen to it! If people like Mike want to hear the Maple Leaf Rag, I can play it. if they want to hear it fast, I play it fast. If they want it with a reggae beat I can even do that. If you want a more accurate version of Joplin's number, ask Jacob instead. If one wants to bring back memories of Nepabunna simply ask Juan to play the I Love Poppy Song on his guitar. Want to hear Smoke On The Water in a guitar falsetto? Justin with a mute or some sort of pedal and his strumbox could probably arrange it for you. This is individualism. Nobody plays the piano the same way as meor Jacob, or the guitar the same way as Justin or Juan. Want to hear I'm So Itchy Down There by The Clap? Ask Caitlin for her ipod.........oh, there it is on the radio.
So, in closing, if you ipoddians think you can own commercial music.....it owns you! That's it for me, partially because the steam train's run out of steam and partially because my keyboard has melted. Juan, thanks for stocking the casbah with couches......this runaway locomotive really needed the soft impact. Justin's story in true Justin style is weird but brilliant. Kind of like last night on the Titanic stiff upper lip British aristocratic inevitability. "Are we sinking Watson?" "Yes my lady, I do think we are. Where's the brandy?".
Legal Disclaimer: Caitlin Hadrill was used for demonstration purposes only. No Caitlin Hadrills were harmed in the writing of this rant. Should any Caitlin Hadrills be upset, Angus Main reserves the right to have any verbal comeuppance on himself published on the Couch Casbah. I really should get back to work...... |